This small, quiet Reverso still makes me smile. Simple (in the elegant way) and very comfortable to wear. Extra smiles generated by the dial and the applted markers. Coming from a Reverso Grande GMT with 8 days of autonomy, the downside is a fairly low (a
I have been badly bitten by the Reverso. Latest addition this year was the Reverso Tribute Monoface with its close-to-the-original size. This may well be how I end up… I guess there are worse fates… Happy New Year Claus
I'm generally a fan of the Reverso (I have 3), but really only when the case flips to reveal some sort of complication. In fact, I wore this one today: Reverso Chronographe Retrograde The Reverso Monoface doesn't do much for me, and that Tank is elegant.
very similar to the previous version. The main differences are the size, a bit smaller, and the guilloche. FEATURES CASE Stainless steel Dimensions (L x W): 40.1 x 24.4 mm, L : Lug to lug Thickness: 7.56mm WATER RESISTANCE 3 bar DIAL Silvered grey, Vertic
I went to the AD to try it and I liked it but it was a bit small for my big wrist. The size is 24.4mm width x 40.1mm length x 7.56mm thick. Is this the size of yours? I see it perfect on your wrist. Source: monochrome watches This is the model I am talkin
A couple of quick snaps of my growing Reverso family. A Tribute to 1931, NY Boutique Edition, a Reverso Chronographe Rétrograde, a Grande GMT and the newest addition, a Tribute Monoface. Looking across the four watches, I am amazed by the family resemblan
Went to my AD today to get a couple of new strapa. I think both watches ended up well. Unfortunately, they also had an example of the recent Reverso Tribute Monoface, the one that is quite a bit smaller than other Tribute models. Not only was the size pre
The Tribute Duoface Small Seconds with the black dial introduced at this year's W&W ! It was always clear to me that only a Duoface version would enter my collection but previous models never gave me full satisfaction. All changed when JLC introduced